Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All submissions are initially assessed by an editor, who decides whether or not the article fits the scope of the journal and is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.

The journal operates a modified single-blind peer review process. This means that referees remain anonymous unless they recommend acceptance. Referees who recommend acceptance are identified in the article colophon should the article be accepted for publication.

We encourage referees to review the article as soon as possible, preferably within two to four weeks. Please let us know if you expect to require more than four weeks.

Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editorial board on behalf of the Canadian Society for Digital Humanities/Société canadienne des humanités numériques.

 

Section Policies

Research

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Method

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Commentary

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Review Articles

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Book/Website Reviews

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Quick links